TURN ISRAEL INTO PARIAH STATE TO ‘END OCCUPATION,’ UN OFFICIAL URGES

 

The United Nations must “review Israel’s status as a law-abiding member of the United Nations” by declaring its “occupation as illegal,” UN Human Rights Council special investigator Michael Lynk said on Thursday.

Such a move would isolate Israel internationally by way of forcing it to end its “occupation” of Palestinian territories, Lynk said at a press conference in New York.

“Israel is not North Korea,” in that its economy is dependent on international trade, particularly the US and Europe, Lynk said. This fact can empower the global community to force change, he added.

What if, “all of a sudden Israelis wanting to travel abroad needed to have visas” or “if all of a sudden Israel wouldn’t get preferential trade agreements with the EU?” Lynk posited.

What if the many forms of military, economic or academic cooperation with Israel would now end? Lynk asked.

If that would come to pass, there would be sea change in Israel’s attitude toward the Palestinians, he said.

Entrepreneur Elevator Pitch Ep6: Can a Saliva Test Tell You Whether He’s the One?
Sponsored by Connatix

Lynk spoke in advance of a presentation he plans to make to the Third Committee on Friday, urging it to formulate a resolution to the UN that would give the international body a wider tool box to use against Israel.

This would include a UN General Assembly resolution that ask the International Court of Justice at The Hague to issue an advisory opinion on whether Israel’s “occupation” was illegal, Lynk said.

He explained that there is a vast difference between a legal and an illegal occupation, particularly with regard to sanction tools that the UN could use against it.

“Now we regard Israel as the lawful occupant of the Palestinian territories, albeit with a range illegal features to it,” Lynk said.

“If we now change that from being a lawful occupant to an illegal occupant, that raises the pressure on what the international community would now be obliged to do under its [new] obligation on non-cooperation with Israel in the continuation,” Lynk said.

Such a declaration is unusual, but was done in 1971 when the International Court of Justice issued an advisory opinion that South Africa’s administration of Nambia was illegal, Lynk said.

Should Israel’s “occupation” be declared unlawful, then the UN chould consider making use of the Uniting for Peace resolution, which could give the UN General Assembly the power to sanction Israel.

Lynk is a Canadian legal expert who holds the post of special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories for the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and is mandated to solely look at Israeli actions, not Palestinian ones.

Lynk clarified that his position was not anti-Israel. This mandate is not aimed at Israel, but at its occupation of a territory that is not its own, said Lynk. Those who believe that his words or his mandate are anti-Israeli are just trying to confuse the issue, Lynk claimed.

The NGO UN Watch took issue with the one-sided nature of Lynk’s statements.

“By any definition of human rights, morality and logic, if Mr. Lynk is a United Nations human rights monitor for the Palestinian territories, he must address Palestinian Authority and Hamas torture and arbitrary arrest committed against their own people, and Palestinian stabbings, car ramming attacks and shootings committed against Israelis,” said Hillel Neuer, executive director of the Geneva-based human rights group UN Watch.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s