A Mythical Worldview vs Jewish Religions

http://www.renegadetribune.com/mythical-worldview-vs-jewish-religions/

 

Physical forms are the most important aspect of a culture. The faces, the gestures, the body types we see in our everyday life are the biggest sources of information that shape our consciousness. The fact that we see White people or Mexicans around us has more impact on our vision of the world than anything else. The face of a White person, his natural expressions and postures, mold our perceptions in a most powerful way, and the same is valid when we see around us mostly Mexican or black creatures.

I will go so far as to say that the greatest masterpieces of art, literature, philosophy and science in Europe were inspired by the everyday visual experience of the creators.

In a multicultural society the forms we encounter are so confused that the information has no meaning anymore and everyone starts to turn away from the social and cultural life. This cultural and social life become a grotesque theater that no one regards as worthy of seeing.

In a metaphysical sense, we can speak about our societies being demythified. A sense of destiny accompanied by magical occurrences, strange coincidences, luck, heroism, etc. belong to Nature, but once our societies are broken down into conglomerations of unrelated loners, our mythical word dies out and is replaced by a mechanic, fully predictable and fully controlled environment.

As an example, falling in love and finding your partner is one of the most magical experiences in our lives, shaped by destiny and the unexplainable, but once we live in a Technocracy it will be racist and sexist to try to choose your own partner; the state will pair people using algorithms in order to produce the employees needed by the market. Where is the heroism of stealing her heart? Where is destiny? Answer: They are sterilized by the Jew.

Where is the mythical experience here?

Does it seem too crazy? We see already trends toward this direction. If we didn’t have an overpopulated planet (mostly with mediocre people) we could easily raise and kill animals in a dignified way in order to get our meat, but now it is immoral to choose what we eat, namely to eat meat. The same financial growth that created this moral problem wants to take away our freedom in order to become more efficient! The agent of disease hasn’t been removed but we think we can get cured by giving it more power over us?

So long we keep with Jewish financial growth, every further production of nourishment will be problematic and meat is just the first symptom. In the future it will be immoral to choose what you eat and you must be satisfied with what the state throws into your dish; the same that a farm animal must be content with what the farmer gives him. Thus, we see that our morality is mostly determined by the market; what is efficient for our exploitation gets heralded as moral.

Jewish financial growth created the problem

But returning to our theme, that’s precisely what makes cruel the mass consumption of animals; it is not the fact that they are killed. In Nature animals die all the time without their lives being less happy. Life in the wild is exciting, rewarding, and as painful it must be to be eaten by a lion, the adrenaline and their heroic attitude makes sure animals die without regrets, without this making their lives less worthy.

What makes mass consumption cruel is the way animals are raised; they are robbed completely of their sense of destiny and of their mythical experience. Death seems only merciful compared with a life devoid of The Transcendental, which is only to be reached in contact with Nature.

The Jew wants to do the same with you

For us humans this process of demythifying our societies began with Christianity. The Jewish god is the total opposite of a mythical Nature; this faceless being rejects all human expressions, including all forms of art; he represents the incomprehensible nothingness that lives alone and needs nothing from anyone. He created the world as a static machine and these characteristics suit very well a technocracy of plastic stuff and algorithms; it is a world completely controlled, without place for rebellions, without the creativity of Nature.

Furthermore, in such a Technocracy where the heroism of Nature is absent, every little misfortune becomes overwhelming, death becomes a taboo and even the slightest aggression is seen as evil. This Christian fragility, over-sensitivity and nostalgia for humanness, this excessive caring for moral things, this crying for everything, is characteristic of a spiritually empty race that has lost its contact with Nature as its source of strength, a race that forgot that death and negative emotions are part of the Beauty of life, a race that forgot that shadows are necessary too for painting a beautiful picture.

animals enjoy their wild lives

We could say that Christian morals resemble the syndrome of emotional trauma. What once was beautiful, challenging, exiting and even funny produces fear and sadness. This person finds relief only when alone in an empty room, lying on the floor in fetal position, where everything is ‘safe’, isolated from all living beings.

Thus, Christian morals make sense only in a world where people feel themselves spiritually empty, powerless, abandoned, etc. and those symptoms are characteristic of someone who lost contact with race, the necessity of death and the necessity of adapting to society.

Could it be that Christian morals have been all the way preparing us for this materialistic nightmare?

For our ancestors divinity represented the total opposite. God and Nature were one and the same, therefore Nature could not be inferior to any god. There was a natural continuum from human towards divinity, from matter to spirit; there were no irreconcilable dualisms.

You won the appreciation of your enemy by fighting against him and not by ignoring the differences; you fought him with respect and recognition, and he enjoyed being fought by a worthy enemy. It was the Jewish god who brought moral arrogance and the idea of transforming the enemy into something he is not.

In Nature there are no contradictions; you can hate without being consumed by it, you can dislike without really hurting anyone, you can create something positive out of negative feelings, you can do someone a favor by rejecting him, and these attitudes are destructive, only when they are trapped inside dualistic-thinking, such as it is characteristic of Judaism and Marxism.

If a crazy admirer of Hitler goes and kills hundreds of innocent people, he is actually being driven by dualistic thinking implanted on him. His inner Nature felt herself attracted to the beauty of race, but he found only the satanic lies with which the Jews disguise Nature. Under so much suffering, this inner Nature becomes a destructive force, cruelly robbed of all means of healthy expression. Needless to say, these people are a reflection of the Jewish mind and not of Hitler.

The Jew wanted to be a Pagan Hero?

Judaism was the first step toward a materialistic nightmare; soon after came Christianity, disguising Judaism with a seemly pagan form. Placing god on earth and fulfilling heroic deeds (in order to reach divinity) is a 100% pagan theme and cannot come from a snobbish god who regards this word as unworthy. Thus, experts realized some time ago the adventures of Jesus on earth were taken from pagan heroes, presumably in order to make monotheism more appealing to the Goy.

The fact that the adventures of Jesus are a copy of pagan myths explains the absurdity of Jesus’ ‘life‘ on earth.

Why does he have to go through a passion on earth if he is already an all-powerful god? This makes sense only if he was at first just a human who wanted to earn divinity. Challenges won’t make you better if you are already ‘perfect‘ and Jesus was already ‘perfect’, therefore his adventures on earth make no theological sense and they can be understood only as a strategy of marketing.

By the way, for our ancestors there was no such thing as all-perfect gods; gods themselves had to go through many more challenges too.

Why does he have to get sacrificed in order to save humanity? In pagan myths it was the other way around; the hero must save his people FIRST (not the whole of humanity!) in order to earn divinity, whereas Jesus is already divine without having worked for it.

Jesus’ divinity doesn’t depend on heroism, as is the case with pagan heroes, it depends actually on nothing and suspiciously enough he ‘saves’ humanity only when he dies. This means that….

At the time when Jesus leaves this world no one can say for sure who Jesus saved nor how this happened and it is our problem to define this nebulous salvation while Jewsus quietly leaves this world and disappears from our view.

If saving people is a good test of heroism, our pagan heroes can say for sure who did they save and how, while Jesus’ salvation is tricky just as everything the Jews do. Our pagan heroes follow the rules of Nature by saving only their people (from other people indeed), while Jesus claims he saved all humanity, although it is just a claim.

Beowulf saved people of his race, while alive, through heroic deeds.

Most people agree it is better to have something modest, done right, instead of beautiful promises that are impossible to fulfill.

In summary, the contradictions of being divine without having earned it, and of saving your people once you cannot prove it anymore can be understood, only when these adventures are seen as clumsy adaptations of pagan myths.

The pagan attitude of aiming for success ON EARTH is also in accordance with reality, because we don’t become better persons and we don’t get forward spiritually, when we simply condemn the whole world as evil, waiting to be killed by our passivity and our moral arrogance. That belongs only in a lazy spirit.

***

This theme of an all-mighty god doing a sacrifice is also analogous to an all-wealthy globalist giving money for charity; it has absolutely no merit. Jewish Globalists can through speculation dispose of the money they already gave and even of the money you have now in your wallet, thus, they lose nothing when they give money for charity.

Worst of all, this supposed charity is a way of expanding their power because population growth in black Africa means more slaves to expand the market.

Jesus was already all-powerful, therefore every challenge or passion is meaningless and the supposed salvation of humanity did nothing more than taking away spiritual power from us.

Christianity is not a religion but a moral approach to trade

For reasons that will become clearer in the next section, I don’t consider Christianity a religion anymore but rather a moral approach to trade. Its core values of universalism, equality, and turning the other cheek are intended to facilitate the circulation of goods and people and it seems the elites had been trying very hard to legitimate these values with a grounding myth, but all their efforts in this aspect have failed miserably. The best they came up with was the erring of Jesus on earth, but as showed above this makes no real sense.

Religion, Money and Society

In this context, it is interesting to see that the first money recorded in history was the Shekel. It was invented in Sumer (the very first civilization in the Orient) and these Shekels were dedicated to the Semitic goddess Inanna, who, strangely enough, was the first crucified deity in history. Inanna went through a passion similar to Jesus and was crucified by demons in heaven.

Sumerian goddess Inanna

The historian Richard Carrier has demonstrated in his research that the first versions of Jesus’s myth resembled a lot the myth of Innana: In the oldest versions (like The Ascension of Isaiah) Jesus went in his passion through different celestial spheres and was crucified in outer-space by demons; it was only later that the whole thing was set on earth using historical references.

The first Christians believed Jesus was an angel crucified in outer space (right under the moon) and they knew about his passion only trough revelations.

Shekel, as you may have already noticed, is the Jewish name for money to this day, therefore we see that the connection between Jews, money and savior gods goes back to the dawn of history.

The connection between religion and an economic system, though, is not a Jewish invention. The German scholar Bernhard Laum showed already in 1924 in his book ‘Heiliges Geld’ (Holy Money) that the concept of money evolved from the offerings to the gods in the temple among many Indo-European peoples.

Image result for Bernhard Laum

It will require more research to explain how exactly the Jews developed their financial system, but in the case of our ancestors what the people ‘paid’ or sacrificed to the gods (at first animals) became standardized, and those standards were later extended to every day exchange. Thus, the way people sacrificed to the gods molded how people exchanged with one another, and religious values took part in local handle.

Celtic coins are full of religious symbols and show a transcendental view of Nature

We can see here the difference between real and Jewish religions. Real religions originate from the people and these express themselves in their economic system, whereas Jewish religions are artificial, created to enslave other peoples.

Our Indo-European ancestors invented a kind of money that fostered cooperation, that was in tune with Nature and their gods; a money whose value was covered with services and goods and not a money whose value depended on speculation and scarcity.

Thus, the difference between (pagan) heroic religions and (Jewish) salvation religions is not irrelevant for our financial problems today; Jesus and Innana create destructive usury while Wotan and Freya foster Beauty and culture.

From the most primitive to the most advanced peoples, interests were always considered a perversion with only one exception… and that is the Jew. The Jews are the people who forced usury in the economic system of all humanity, with catastrophic consequences for Mother Nature and us.

For the ones who say they were forced to act as money lenders, let me reply that money-lending is rather a privilege, that almost no-one can afford. It is absurd that out of desperation they took the best and most comfortable occupations in those times.

for most of our history usury was recognized as an evil

Most important is the fact that a money lender can have a decent income and have a respectable place in society without applying usury to his loan. He can simply ask for a fair amount that corresponds to his work and his services, playing fair with the prevailing economic system. The difference is enormous.

We have to realize too that the prohibition of usury in Christianity seems rather suspicious when it only applies to Christians. It’s almost like an extension of the Jewish law: The Jew is allowed to apply usury only to the Goyim (astute move) while the Goyim are allowed to take usury only from the Jew (stupid move).

The Church was always able to forbid all kinds of usury to everyone (regardless of religion) and if this never happened despite the bad consequences, there must have been some collaboration between the church and the Jews, as is recorded between Jews and nobles.

Now let’s make a comparison between economic values. I said in my last article that the attitude of Yahweh towards other Gods reflects the arrogance of the Jews toward other peoples, now we see that the monetary system invented by the Jews clashes violently with the economic system of our pagan ancestors. Usury is the main characteristic of Jewish finance, therefore I will use the word Interests/usury as a synonym of Jewish finance:

  • Jewish interests force competition among the members of a society instead of cooperation, as was natural among our ancestors.
  • Jewish interests create the artificial need for growth, whereas in a Celto-Germanic economy growth had natural limits in accord with sustainability.
  • Jewish interests concentrate the riches in ever fewer hands, whereas in Celtic and Germanic societies all members invested in the social good and the differences in riches were relatively small.
  • Jewish usury makes sure people can invest only in short-term plans (at the expense of future generations), whereas the system of our ancestors was able to take long-term factors into consideration, like natural resources and culture.

It is interesting that during the times when Europe revived pagan economy and prohibited Jewish usury, there was a cultural boom and the most beautiful constructions in history, namely cathedrals, were built. This was only possible because pagan economy can invest in long-term projects that require a lot of time, benefiting ONLY the common good, instead of a few investors.

Related image
This was possible because of a pagan economic system
  • Another important difference is that the economic system of our pagan ancestors was self-regulating (just like a living organism), whereas Jewish economy requires constant intervention, amendments and regulations, from ever bigger banks.
  • The economy of our ancestors was backed up with goods and services, whereas the value of money in a Jewish system depends on it being scarce. All central banks today compete very hard in order to keep their currency scarce.

Thus, the monetary system of a society is like its vascular system, it ensures that all organs have what they need in order to be alive and perform well. Every race develops a monetary system according to its special needs, values and talents.

Our pagan ancestors had a fair economy based on cooperation and there was always enough for everyone.

It is to be admired that despite usury, Whites have been able to create the most cooperative societies, where the differences in riches are the smallest, and that reflects the social values of Whites since pagan times. Obviously these goals can be reached immensely better with an Aryan economic system, and every success will always be furtive, so long we keep with Jewish finance.

It seems to me the Jews wanted to impose their dystopic equality on all humanity, and the only way possible was through the total monopolization of power and riches; only then could this unnatural regime be forced into place, only then could they dictate the balance of power among nations, fabricating prosperity or stagnation, as needed to mobilize the masses.

But there was a catch, direct confrontation was out of the question, and it had to progress slowly, so that no-one realize what is happening. They came up with interest rates; indirectly but surely, these concentrate all riches in their hands, and what better method of heralding this new invention, as with a universalistic religion of blind tolerance and submission.

Only through the total monopolization of riches could the Jew force his reign of equality

We can see here also that if money has its roots on religion, a religious shift represents an economic shift. It is our duty to develop an economic system that comes out the Aryan soul and represents Aryan values.

There are new experiments around the world with monetary systems that don’t allow usury, including Bitcoin. The interesting thing is that many of them must be regional in order to work. I see that as a confirmation that universalism is anti-natural and destructive. As soon as we adopt a regional system, societies become alive again. Regionalism and differentiation are the essence of life.

Reconstructing Christianity in Rome

An interesting aspect of how Jews invent their religions has become known only today in the age of information. During the Middle Ages in was impossible for the people to know how Christianity was created, although many of them doubted already its veracity (regarding religious skepticism in the Middle Ages I strongly recommend the book ‘Belief and Unbelief in Medieval Europe’ by John H Arnold). 

The Christian scholar Rodney Stark has demonstrated in his research that Christianity didn’t begin as a slave’s movement, as has been claimed since the first Christian writers, rather it was first welcomed by the privileged elites and later spread to the masses.

The Jews were accused by several Roman politicians of amassing too much power and conspiring against the Empire (see ‘Separation and its Discontents’ by Prof. Kevin Macdonald)

This sequence of events makes a lot of sense; during the last years of The Western Roman Empire, there was a political struggle between financers, politicians and the people. In the end corrupt politicians were convinced by the Jewish handlers to adopt Christianity.

Soon what had been heralded as a religion of tolerance was declared as the only allowed religion in the empire, not without some resistance from some groups, who saw the implications of this tyranny.

When Christian writers created the narrative of the events, they decided the resistance against this tyranny was nothing more than arbitrary persecution, based on hate and intolerance. In those days there didn’t exist yet the word racism, otherwise they would have portrayed it as something like a bunch of Nazis persecuting minorities out of racism.

Only after the elites found it good, this oriental religion was spread among the unsatisfied masses, through propaganda and false claims of miracles. This resembles the way most elite politicians today adopt multiculturalism and spread its message, based only on moral claims. The miracle stories that the Gospels spread in those times are analogous to the false claims about peace and prosperity that are spread in the media today.

It becomes only cheesier with time

But the analogies don’t stop there. While the Roman Empire was being destroyed through financial exploitation and unnecessary expansion, the Empire was accused of having tortured and sadistically killed the son of god, who curiously enough happened to be an Israelite. It seems the Romans had no gas chambers back then for executing Jesus.

In some Gospels a specific branch of Judaism was also made guilty, but that has more to do with conflicts among Jews, who sometimes don’t agree about the less dangerous method of enslaving the Goyim. The Jews promoting Christianity wanted to attack the conservative Jews, who opposed the Christianization of the Goy.

The best proof of Jewish treacherousness is the fact that even their own movements turn against them, as soon as the gullible liberals find out about their lies. Thus, the Jew didn’t expect their new religion could turn against them, as it happened during the Middle Ages, just as they didn’t expect Communism could become anti-Semitic, as happened with Stalin.

Today we have a fifth Gospel in which the role of Rome is taken over by Germany; the cross is now the column in a gas chamber and Jesus reincarnated in 6 Million of his racial-mates. The message remains the same, though: the prophets of universality went through a passion and were executed by the worldly powers, who doubted their supernatural claims. This passion legitimates the rule of these self-anointed.

The crucifixion of the son of god was the worst crime thinkable in those times and it served to legitimate any future genocide perpetrated by Christianity, putting the guilt on the victims. Exactly the same happened to NS Germany.

The Allies knew they had committed serious crimes. They bombed 13 Million innocent women and children out of sadism, and those killings were unnecessary for winning in the battle front. They aimed purposely against houses and architectonic art, buildings whose destruction brought no military advantages. In some areas they destroyed as much as 90% of all historical architecture, most of them irreplaceable masterpieces, dating as far back as the Middle Ages.

It is laughable when Hollywood films claim the Allies rescued works of art. The only art they ‘rescued’ were a bunch of paintings that Hitler had in an underground base. Hitler made very clear in his political testament he wanted these paintings to survive the war and be put in a museum in München, for everyone to admire.

From beginning to end there is not a bit of truth in this film

They would have burned under Allied bombing if Hitler hadn’t taken some measures; the Allies found them accidentally, after having destroyed everything else! It is more realistic to say Hitler saved those paintings from the Allies than the other way around.

Such efficiency of destruction can obviously not be reached accidentally. They wanted to destroy all memories of the past and make place for McDonald’s restaurants, shopping centers and abstract art.

When their killing orgy was over, they needed desperately a German sin in order to turn the guilt away from them, and this leads me to my favorite argument, while dealing with everyday historians:

The Allies had no idea of the Holocaust while destroying Germany and killing millions of innocent women and children, therefore they were very lucky of finding a reason in the end; Wasn’t there a Holocaust, they had to invent one in order to legitimate such a massacre. Had Hitler used less cruel methods or had he killed less Jews, they would still have appeared as the bad guys, therefore they were indeed very lucky that Hitler’s actions suited so perfect their post-war needs’.

Of course we know better than that; the Holocaust is a lie weaved by the Allies to suit their post-war needs, but this argument shows how absurd the whole thing sounds even when we follow the official narrative.

This was totally unnecessary for winning in the battlefront

The number six must have a symbolical meaning to the Jews, just like the Star of David with six points, and this six had to be made into millions in order to be tragic.

Thus, we see how modern history gives us a glimpse of how Jews create their religions, but continuing with the Romans, they were not really White and they were never as noble and creative as the Aryans, but they were nevertheless victims of cultural poisoning and financial parasitism, just like us.

We could see them as a brown version of America: They began with a modest kingdom with healthy morals and traditions, and then came the Jew transforming it into a multicultural slave empire of rapacious economic expansion, and just before its deliberate destruction, the corpse was made guilty of its terrible lot, through propaganda and a new religion.

Rescuing our Myths

Our economic system led me to Christianity, Christianity led me to our pagan ancestors and now I want to tell why the pagan myths of our ancestors are so important today, in order to get out of this economic mess.

I believe our myths are now more important than ever. We all have experienced The Transcendental, otherwise we wouldn’t be visiting this website. We know there is something more than a materialistic existence, we know Mother Nature reaches into the magical and the divine, therefore the religious experiences of our ancestors must have a basis in reality.

If our ancestors had a real spiritual life, at all, the fact that this planet is being driven to destruction, by a satanic force out of this planet, could have not escaped to them. In fact, the destruction we are experiencing today is the greatest threat to our spiritual life; it is the same force that made war against paganism around 2000 years ago and now has financially enslaved the whole of humanity.

The Yaqui Indian shaman Don Juan Matus knew about the predator through his contact with Nature, and just the same, our pagan ancestors must have had an idea about this evil force threatening all life on this planet. Here is the famous quote from Carlos Castaneda about the predator:

We have a predator that came from the depths of the cosmos and took over the rule of our lives. Human beings are its prisoners. The Predator is our lord and master. It has rendered us docile, helpless. If we want to protest, it suppresses our protest. If we want to act independently, it demands that we don’t do so

… I have been beating around the bush all this time, insinuating to you that something is holding us prisonerIndeed we are held prisoner! “This was an energetic fact for the sorcerers of ancient Mexico … They took us over because we are food for them, and they squeeze us mercilessly because we are their sustenance. just as we rear chickens in chicken coops, the predators rear us in human coops, humaneros. Therefore, their food is always available to them.”

“No, no, no, no,” [Carlos replies] “This is absurd don Juan. What you’re saying is something monstrous. It simply can’t be true, for sorcerers or for average men, or for anyone.”

“Why not?” don Juan asked calmly. “Why not? Because it infuriates you? … You haven’t heard all the claims yet. I want to appeal to your analytical mind. Think for a moment, and tell me how you would explain the contradictions between the intelligence of the engineer and the stupidity of his systems of beliefs, or the stupidity of his contradictory behaviour.

Sorcerers believe that the predators have given us our systems of belief, our ideas of good and evil, our social mores. They are the ones who set up our hopes and expectations and dreams of success or failure. They have given us covetousness, greed, and cowardice. It is the predators who make us complacent, routine, and egomaniacal.”

“‘But how can they do this, don Juan? [Carlos asked further, somehow angered by what don Juan was saying]. “‘Do they whisper all that in our ears while we are asleep?”

“‘No, they don’t do it that way. That’s idiotic!” don Juan said, smiling. “They are infinitely more efficient and organized than that. In order to keep us obedient and meek and weak, the predators engaged themselves in a stupendous maneuver; stupendous, of course, from the point of view of a fighting strategist.

A horrendous maneuver from the point of view of those who suffer it. They gave us their mind! Do you hear me? The predators give us their mind, which becomes our mind. The predators’ mind is baroque, contradictory, morose, filled with the fear of being discovered any minute now.”

“I know that even though you have never suffered hunger… you have food anxiety, which is none other than the anxiety of the predator who fears that any moment now its manoeuvre is going to be uncovered and food is going to be denied. Through the mind, which, after all, is their mind, the predators inject into the lives of human beings whatever is convenient for them. And they ensure, in this manner, a degree of security to act as a buffer against their fear.”

“The sorcerers of ancient Mexico were quite ill at ease with the idea of when [the predator] made its appearance on Earth. They reasoned that man must have been a complete being at one point, with stupendous insights, feats of awareness that are mythological legends nowadays. And then, everything seems to disappear, and we have now a sedated man.

What I’m saying is that what we have against us is not a simple predator. It is very smart, and organized. It follows a methodical system to render us useless. Man, the magical being that he is destined to be, is no longer magical. He’s an average piece of meat.”

“There are no more dreams for man but the dreams of an animal who is being raised to become a piece of meat: trite, conventional, imbecilic.”

Wow, that description fits the Jew perfectly. I believe the myths of our ancestors are a warning too, but they are less obvious because they wanted their myths to apply to all times and different situations. As a first example, the pervasive theme in Nordic fairy tales, about the prince being transformed by an evil wizard into a scary bear reminds me of what happened to Germany after WWII.

The heroic prince was transformed into a scary creature. Picture from the Norwegian fairy tale ‘East of the Sun and West of the Moon’.

Almost like a magic spell, the Jew transformed Germany into a beast through lies and propaganda, and Germany was forced to live as an outcast. The beautiful peasant girl represents White people, who must trust and accept the beast, despite of its ugly form in order to discover its real identity. She discovers that the beast is a handsome prince and that his ugliness was due to an evil spell.

White people must start loving their culture and race in order to discover they have been disguised by the Jew, that race is in reality like a virtuous hero and not like a brutal beast.

The Volsunga Saga or The Song of The Nibelungs.

I consider the saga of the Volsungs as a warning too of what happened during the fall of Rome and what is happening now. Here we have little space for telling the whole story but I’ll assume we all have a notion of it and I’ll jump directly to the interpretation.

Characters in the story:

  • Siegfried: He represents White people and our Germanic ancestors.
  • Dragon: He represents the degenerate Roman Empire.
  • The Gold of the Nibelungs: It represents our Jewish financial system.
  • Gunnar: He represents the worldly aspect of Christianity and the courtly life.
  • Gudrun: As sister of Gunnar, she represents Christianity in her Germanized form, the Christianity that emerged from the marriage with the Aryans.
  • Brunhild: She represents Nature, destiny and paganism.

As just mentioned, Siegfried portrays a heroic, idealistic race, whereas the dragon plays the role of the degenerate Roman Empire. Our Germanic ancestors killed this dragon but they inherit a cursed treasure which is our financial System.

Brunhild represents the Transcendental in Nature, the guardian spirits of our race, what Adolf Hitler often referred to as  ‘die Vorsehung’ (providence). She was proud of the achievements of Siegfried and she knew the fall of Rome could mean a better future for Whites.

Brunhild and Siegfried swore love to each other, this meaning our ancestors were doing the right thing in accordance with Nature.

Related image
Siegfried and Brunhild by Charles Ernest Butler

Entering into the courtly life, Siegfried is made to forget about his true love (Brunhild) and he is asked to marry her with Gunnar, his new patron. Siegfried himself marries Gudrun, the sister of Gunnar.

This means that our Germanic ancestors were seduced by the riches and power offered by Christianity to the point that they end up marrying their traditions (Brunhild) with a materialistic faith (Christianity) and this marriage had to aspects:

  1. The Germanization of Christianity represented by the marriage of Siegfried with Gudrun.
  2. The prostitution of our traditions represented by the marriage of Gunnar with Brunhild.

Siegfried put his talents into the service of someone else and not of his Race, therefore his entrance into the court of Gunnar and marrying Gudrun represents the entrance of Whites into the courtly life and adopting Christianity.

Gudrun and Brunhild (Christianity and Paganism) live together in the same court for a while but there are tensions and in the end Brunhild feels herself betrayed and offended, as she realized she married a coward (Gunnar – Christianity) and Siegfried had forgot about her real bride (Nature).

Gudrun & Brunhild by Arthur Rackham

This means that even when we try to conciliate Christianity with Nature (using self-deception) it will always mean the suffering of the latter.

Siegfried says to Brunhild he wasn’t aware of what he was doing because he took a charmed drink that made him forget about his real bride. This means the material riches of Christianity seduced them like an enchanted drink making them forget who they really are and betray Nature (Brunhild). This happened because our ancestor didn’t know yet about the Jew and the evilness behind Christianity.

Siegfried takes the drink of forgetfulness

The marriage of Brunhild with Gunnar means also the marriage of our destiny with the Christian faith; it is a marriage based on deception and the bride is deeply dissatisfied, thus she asks for the death of Siegfried.

Brunhild orders his husband to kill Siegfried and Gunnar decides to obey, although that means breaking a sacred oath, because Gunnar wants the gold of the Nibelungs. In other words, when Brunhild orders Gunnar to betray Siegfried it means Christianity is forced by destiny to betray Whites; betrayal is anchored in the essence of Christianity.

Siegfried is killed from the back under the command of Gunnar

The essence of Christianity is Globalism, which is nothing more than the rule of avarice and betrayal and those characteristics are present in Gunnar. The fact that Gunnar breaks his sacred oath means that these fake religions like Christianity and Multiculti destroy and enslave despite of their moral claims.

Gudrun, his sister, represents the female side of Christianity, e.i. Germanized Christianity, the better version of Christianity that came out of the union with White people.

Gudrun, despite being of nobler nature and of falling in love with Siegfried, is powerless in the end of stopping the curse of the Nibelungs and of deflecting destiny. This means that European Christianity, despite of having been a nationalistic force in the past and of having fought from time to time against the Jew or the Moslems, her power is still insufficient because it is based in the false foundations.

A Jewish religion of universalism is destined to poison and destroy whoever adopts it no matter how much we try to Germanize it or reinterpret it; Just like dormant HIV, its development is always towards destruction of the inner force.

Brunhild never loses her love toward Siegfried and she kills herself after finding out about Siegfried’s death, therefore we see that the death of our race (Siegfried) causes the death of our destiny and our inner Nature (Brunhild), but we should realize that this story is only a warning and that the saga doesn’t end there.

Related image
The funeral of Siegfried and Brunhild

I think the death of Siegfried and Brunhild expresses the destruction brought by Christianity in those times. It represents the death of the Germanic hero and the pagan faith and not the death of Whites per-se, and as history shows us, these two things are not really dead; they can be awakened in us. Furthermore, our ancestors believed in reincarnation and all sagas makes sense only under this interpretation.

Siegfried and his protector Valkyrie may have died but their spirits keep reincarnating in our race, continuing the fight against bastardization and enslavement.

***

Our pagan gods express themselves in us and Adolf Hitler had so much of Wotan in his spirit as Arminius. No incarnation is less faithful because our gods become more perfect when they adopt a human form. Nature sends from time to time heroes who for unexplainable reasons have in their souls more of Nature than others, and what is the essence of Nature if not idealism, artistic creativity and heroism?

Hitler was above everything an artist, a genius inspired by Nature

With this final reflection we can end this article: We saw that Jesus’ divinity is based on privilege and was never earned, whereas the divinity of our pagan heroes depended on heroism and achievement. That’s what differentiates our gods from Semitic idols; the divinity of our gods depends on their relationship with Nature and our heroes can take part on that divinity, whereas the divinity of Jewish gods depends on being alone, on rejecting all living things and no one is allowed to take part on it.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s