Thousands of years, the great Black Sea of today did not exist. Instead, in its place was a large lake surrounded by a fertile plain. The lake was fed by a number of major rivers—the famous Danube, the Dnieper, Rioni, Southern Bug and Dniester. Is this plain an ancient cradle of the Indo-European race? There is evidence pointed that way. Then in a sudden cataclysm, the Earth moved and the Bosporus (or Bosphorus) Strait opened up, drowning the lake and plain in well over 100,000 cubic miles of saltwater. Whatever civilization lived on the plain was wiped out—but not without survivors.
The religious scholar Mircea Eliade, in A History of Religious Ideas, writes:
For more than a century, scholars have made every effort to identify the original homeland of the Indo-Europeans, to decipher their protohistory, and to clarify the phases of their migrations. Their land of origin has been sought in northern and central Europe, in the Russian steppes, in central Asia, in Anatolia etc. It is generally agreed today to localize the home of the Indo-Europeans in the regions north of the Black Sea, between the Carpathians and the Caucasus.”
Most scientists trace their origin to the Kurgan culture of that area. On Feb. 18, 2015, Science Daily reported:
Linguists have long agreed that languages from English to Greek to Hindi, known as ‘Indo-European languages,’ are the modern descendants of a new language family that first emerged from a common ancestor spoken thousands of years ago. Now, a new study gives us more information on when and where it was most likely used. Using data from over 150 languages, linguists provide evidence that this ancestor language originated 5,500 to 6,500 years ago in the Pontic Caspian steppe.”
If so, this coincides with the centuries immediately following a major event in prehistory. It is also situated geographically with where the event occurred.
In 5600 B.C., a catastrophic event occurred that would not only alter the geography of Europe, but transform the culture and demographics of Europe and Asia for all time. It was to be the greatest flood in western Eurasian history, with an impact on myth, folklore and religion unprecedented in the history of the Aryan-speaking peoples. This great flood would influence not only white European tradition and history, but also that of its Semitic and other non-Aryan neighbors as well. Extensive research was done by Robert Ballard, the underwater explorer who discovered the Titanic, and by National Geographic magazine. Arthur Kemp explains:
Meltwaters from the retreating ice sheets at the end of the Pleistocene caused the world’s oceans to rise by almost 328 feet. In 5600 B.C., the risen waters of the Mediterranean Sea burst through the narrow neck of the Bosporus, inundating and destroying the civilization ringing the fertile Black Sea basin. [The Black Sea was theretofore a smaller Black Lake of fresh water.—Ed.] It is this catastrophe which triggered the great Indo-European migrations. . . . Leaving the Black Sea basin, the Nordic Indo-European peoples invaded Europe and Asia.”
This event had remained virtually unknown in modern times, but its discovery would provide an answer to two of the most unremitting mysteries of all time, Noah’s Flood and the location and destruction of Atlantis. As for the latter, it would not solve the riddle of Plato’s account by any means, but would explain why so many civilizations throughout time have spoken about a great mother civilization that was destroyed in an epic flood, often accompanied by fire and destruction from the sky. Obviously there is no evidence of fire from the sky such as a comet or asteroid at this particular juncture in prehistory. Possibly, this is not the only root cause of the Atlantean archetype. Perhaps Hancock and others are right by pointing to a much grander global civilization that was destroyed in a much larger key event.
In his ruminations on the ancient northern Aryan homeland of Thule, the occult philosopher Alfred Rosenberg even admitted:
It is still uncertain where the prehistoric homeland of the Nordic race lies.”
The March 2015 issue of the academic journal Language carried an article by Will Chang, Chundra Cathcart, David Hall and Andrew Garret, entitled “Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European steppe hypothesis.” Science Daily states:
This article provides new support for the ‘steppe hypothesis’ or ‘Kurgan hypothesis’ which proposes that Indo-European languages first spread with cultural developments in animal husbandry around 4500 to 3500 B.C. (An alternative theory proposes that they diffused much earlier, around 7500 to 6000 B.C., in Anatolia in modern-day Turkey.) Both theories do not take into account the final piece to the puzzle which places the main flooding event around 5600 B.C.
This language family most likely already existed prior to the formation of the Kurgan culture, but was used in the cultures near the fresh water lake where the deeper part of the Black Sea is today, and in Anatolia as the alternative theory states. However, this was not a peaceful exchange brought on by the spread of agricultural trade or husbandry. That is a concept meant to remove what is part of our culture and history, that of being a warrior Aryan culture and most likely are set to pursue a pacifistic Marxist agenda on our history. There is clear historical evidence that the Indo-Europeans were both a distinct warrior culture, consisting of a particular host racial group, the Nordics, and that both peaceful and warlike interchange were the methods of how the language was spread.
But this may solve a problem which has perplexed scholars of European and Asian history for almost two centuries. Where did the Indo-European language and culture originate? And finally, who and what are the Indo-Europeans? Nothing of this catastrophe fits that of Plato’s account of Atlantis, nor for that matter the idea of Noah’s flood. The human imagination is a progressive phenomenon, and it is well known once a story is told and retold for many centuries, it must have embellishments; and the cultural flavor of the time and people in which and for which it is being told greatly affects the story. But whether this is the root of these stories or not, there is a possibility that the Indo-Europeans began not in an area near the southwestern part of Russia where many believe they come from, but rather from a part that is now submerged, from a society considerably developed. From this single culture is not only where the Egyptians, Mesopotamians, Thracians, Indo-Aryans, Tocharians etc, can trace their roots, but from where so much of our own modern culture, its language, its myths, even its sense of cultural diversity within our race, not outside it, can find its origins.
William Ryan & Walter Pittman write about this Indo-European diaspora:
The ocean bursting through the Bosporus in 5600 B.C. so violently cleaved Europe from Anatolia that it would have been several years before anyone dared make passage across. Likewise, at the eastern end of the Black Sea, the snow-tipped Caucasus also presented a formidable barrier. Thus except for the refugees willing to risk a voyage at sea, it is likely that those on the northern and western edge of the flooding Black Sea lake escaped into Europe and Ukraine, and those on the southerly side fled into Anatolia and points beyond.
As people fled, and redistributed into other regions, the legends of the destruction of their civilization, of their high culture, went with them. This included tales of a great flood that ended humanity, with only a few survivors, and even the tale of a great civilization that at its zenith traded with faraway lands and was a focal point of trade and commerce. The Varna culture in northern Bulgaria, which was established shortly after the Black Sea Flood, developed pottery almost identical and contemporaneous with pottery found among the proto-Caucasoid Jomons of Japan, the ancestors of the Caucasoid Ainu, who look remarkably similar to Europeans but are still noticeably different in color and appearance. Mircea Eliade addresses the protohistory of these first great Indo-European peoples with some of the violence and cultural upheaval of the situation. One might readily make a connection between these 3rd millennium refugees from the flooding of the Black Sea and later the political turmoil in their native lands with the swarms of swarthy-skinned migrants arriving from the Middle East daily into Europe. On the contrary, these circumstances today are man-made, deliberate, and calculated for a desired end, and are more an act of war, literally so, than an act of refuge or, as it is said, evolution.
The eruption of the Indo-Europeans into history is marked by terrible destruction. Between 2300 and 1900 B.C. In Greece and Asia Minor many cities are sacked and burned; for example, Troy (about 2300 B.C.), Beycesultan, Tarsus, and some 300 cities and villages in Anatolia. The documents mention ethnic groups named Hittites, Luwians, and Mitanni. But Aryan-speaking elements are also attested in other bodies of invaders. The dispersal of the Indo-European peoples had begun some centuries earlier, and it continued into the Indo-Gangetic plain, the Iranians were firmly established in Persia, and Greece and the islands were Indo-Europeanized. Some centuries later, the Indo-Europeanization of India, the Italian peninsula, the Balkan peninsula, the Carpatho-Danubian regions, and central, northern, and western Europe—from the Vistula to the Baltic Sea and the Atlantic—was either completed or well advanced. This mission of the inhabitants, followed by their assimilation, did not end until the 19th century of our era. Such an example of linguistic and cultural expansion is otherwise unknown.
This transformation was a success, because despite the inherit cultural differences between Pre-Aryan and Aryan Europe, the similarities of racial identification and culture was enough that the assimilation was both easy and positive. It did not matter what tribe they came from, whether they followed a hunter-gathering style of life, or were horse-riding warriors with iron weapons, they were white, and their genetic imprinting, a survival instinct we all have that compels us biologically to identify to those of our own, was clearly at work here. The Indo-Europeans may have seemed strange to the peoples to whom Europe was home, but they were not total strangers, as they were fellow whites who have come as visitors from a faraway land.
The Indo-Europeans, or Aryans, were the root race from which all of the major culture creating civilizations were derived. Adolf Hitler states in Mein Kampf:
If we divide mankind into three categories—founders of culture, champions of culture, and destroyers of culture—the Aryan alone can be considered as representing the first category.” Even in the sight of conflict and forced assimilation, great battles, the victors and the defeated shared common ground.
Indeed, we can return once again to the chief authority of our own century, Arthur Kemp, that the Indo-European tribes “were responsible for many of the world’s principal civilizations: the Aryans in India, the Kassites, the Hittites, and the Persian, Mycenaean, Greek, Roman, Keltic, Teutonic, Slavic and present-day Western European cultures.” It is wrong that political correctness demands Western Europeans and those who ancestors came from the European homeland should be ashamed for our colonialism.
The Turkish empire was the greatest, most long-lasting colonial empire in the history of mankind. The name Slav, applied to the whites of Russia and its neighboring countries, means slave, because the Slavs were so often enslaved by the Turks. This author himself is Slavic. Are Russians requiring that white Russians and all the whites of Europe and America flood Turkey and take over its moral, legal, cultural and religious institutions till nothing of Turkey remains visible? Immigration is not a sin. But when it takes place on a grand scale, when it begins to be an invasion, whether good or bad, the host civilization will end. That is how all civilizations, for better or for worse, cease to exist. Not through economic collapse, warfare or moral degradation, but to the point that the culture that was the life-blood of that nation and civilization ceases to live. Then the old order is swept away and another one takes its place. Some call this process evolution. Others call it genocide.
The prime invasions that were carried out against the native hunter-gatherer and more southeastern Old Europeans, were done by the Keltic, Germanic, Baltic and Slavic peoples. These peoples would be the founding fathers of modern-day Europe. They are the strength and life-blood of the Western and Eastern European people, and indeed of all of white humanity. Subwaves of Nordic peoples continued, included the Mycenaeans who conquered and colonized Greece, and the Latini, or Latins, and related tribes, who took over Italy. These invasions sparked the great classical traditions of ancient Greece and Rome. The invaders, in every respect, found the Old Europeans in these conquered territories generally to be very similar in appearance, in their values; even many of their customs and core values were similar. This made assimilation possible.
The Nordic Latin tribes mixed with the native Old European Etruscans and created a virile and healthy hybrid people that became Roman culture and civilization. This hybridization was only positive because the cultures were of practically the same racial composition, the same level of intellectual and moral achievement, not a mixture of inferior and superior. This same process took place in both Britain and Ireland, and to this day the population is a healthy mix of Old European and taller Nordic racial traits.
We know from genetics that Europeans have been racially uniform for over 17,000 years. This new attempt through immigration and the mass media to promote miscegenation is an attempt to upset that balance. But if we are so similar there does exist hope. Barbara Spectre spoke of a transformation, a great change that has to occur or Europe won’t survive. She is right. There is going to have to be a major transformation, culturally, religiously, racially—but not the destructive one that she hopes for. This is not the brave new world of multiculturalism to many anticipate and expect. Europe must survive or as Hitler has said, civilization will not survive. But to do so we must accept one fact. Despite our linguistic and national boundaries, we have the potential of viewing ourselves first and foremost as white Europeans, as members of a grand white race with a common history, a common genetic heritage which by itself speaks of unity and common origins, and truly evolve into a single, united whole, a transformation into one race, one people. By doing so, no exterior force or race of people could ever again threaten us. The greatest race to ever walk the Earth would be united, and that truly would be an accomplishment of evolution, and a transformation of which to be proud.